Smart home sensor · Founded 2025

Know your air before you breathe it.

AirWater Sense is a connected home sensor that predicts air pollution levels using artificial neural networks and the Internet of Things — so families can act before the air turns unhealthy.

PM10COCO2SO2NO2O3
What it predicts

Six pollutants that shape the air in our cities.

PM10

Particulate matter

Tiny dust and smoke particles small enough to be breathed deep into the lungs.

Dust · construction · traffic
CO

Carbon monoxide

A colourless, odourless gas that reduces the blood's ability to carry oxygen.

Vehicle exhaust · burning fuel
CO2

Carbon dioxide

A greenhouse gas whose levels also signal how well a space is ventilated.

Combustion · crowded rooms
SO2

Sulphur dioxide

A sharp-smelling gas that irritates the airways and eyes.

Burning fuels with sulphur
NO2

Nitrogen dioxide

A traffic-related gas linked to breathing problems and asthma.

Road traffic · engines
O3

Ground-level ozone

Formed when sunlight reacts with other pollutants; irritates the lungs.

Sunlight + traffic emissions
Results

Tested on real data from three major cities in Jordan.

The neural network models were developed and evaluated for three major Jordanian cities. Prediction strength varied by pollutant — and the research is open about where it was weaker.

STRONGEST PREDICTION

Carbon monoxide

CO showed the strongest relationship with weather and city factors.

R² ≈ 1near-perfect fit
7.2 × 10⁻³mean squared error
Carbon monoxide (CO)Strongest
NO2 & O3Variable

Prediction accuracy varied for these pollutants.

Particulate matter (PM10)Weakest

Weakest correlation, because particulate matter comes from many different sources.

Why this suits a home device

The research presents ANN-derived equations as a computationally efficient forecasting tool for places where monitoring networks are limited or costly — exactly where a low-cost home sensor can fill the gap.

Source: Bani Hani et al., Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 24(8), 1657–1665 (2025). doi:10.30638/eemj.2025.129

The device

Small enough for a shelf. Smart enough to forecast.

AirWater Sense brings the neural network forecasting model into a connected device built for homes.

Predicts, not just measures

Neural network models forecast pollutant levels instead of only reporting the present.

Internet of Things

Connects to the internet to combine its readings with local weather conditions.

Timely alerts

Warns the household when the air is forecast to become unhealthy.

Made for homes

Affordable local sensing where public monitoring stations are scarce.

What's next

Getting even sharper.

The research sets out how predictions can improve, especially for pollutants that were harder to forecast.

Today

ANN forecasting of six pollutants from weather and city data.

More inputs

Adding further explanatory variables to the model.

Bigger datasets

Expanding data across longer periods and more locations.

Hybrid models

Combining ANNs with other machine learning methods.

The team

Engineers who design it and build it.

AirWater Sense was founded in 2025 by a research team uniting environmental engineering and modelling with the hands-on skills to manufacture the device.

Faculty of Engineering

Develops the neural network models and the environmental science behind the pollutant forecasts.

Faculty of Engineering Technologies

Designs and manufactures the sensor hardware, electronics and IoT connectivity.

Frequently asked questions

Which pollutants does AirWater Sense predict?

Six: particulate matter (PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ground-level ozone (O3).

How does it predict pollution?

An artificial neural network learns how wind speed, temperature, humidity, population density and vehicular traffic relate to pollutant levels, and uses those relationships to forecast them.

How accurate is it?

Accuracy depends on the pollutant. Carbon monoxide was predicted best, with an R² approaching 1 and a mean squared error of 7.2 × 10⁻³. PM10 was the hardest, because particles come from many different sources.

Where was the model tested?

On data from three major cities in Jordan.

Why use neural network equations?

They are computationally efficient, which makes forecasting practical on affordable devices in places where official monitoring networks are limited or costly.